List of Articles by MeSH

BRUXISM

1. Basić V, Mehulić K. Bruxism: an Unsolved Problem in Dental Medicine. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2004;38(1):87-96.
    [details]
    [close]
   Full Text

   Title in English:	Bruxism: an Unsolved Problem in Dental Medicine
   Title in Croatian:	Bruksizam - neriješen stomatološki problem
   Type of Article:	professional paper
   MeSH:	BRUXISM
   Abstract:	Bruxism exists as long as humanity; since barbarian times, through the Bible and christianity until the modern stressful age. According to American Sleep Disorders Association, the prevalence of bruxism varies from 5 to 20 per cent. This difference can be related to the lack of awareness in eighty per cent of the popullation that has some form of teeth clenching and/or grinding. Many studies have been published, but the results are still contradictory. There is a large scale of different etiological and therapeutical approaches presented in the scientific literature, but the main problem - bruxism in every day practice often remains undetected and badly treated.

2. Basić V, Mehulić K. The Role of Psycho-Emotional Tension and Stress in the Etiology of Bruxism. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2003;37(4):443-52.
    [details]
    [close]
   Full Text

   Title in English:	The Role of Psycho-Emotional Tension and Stress in the Etiology of Bruxism
   Title in Croatian:	Udio psihoemocionalne napetosti i stresa u etiologiji bruksizma.
   Type of Article:	original scientific paper
   MeSH:	BRUXISM PSYCHOPHYSIOL DISORDERS + complications STRESS + complications
   Abstract:	The cause of bruxism is still unknown. The most commonly referred factor in the etiology of bruxism is that of psychogenic origin. This study was an attempt to evaluate the role of stress, psycho emotional tension and anxiety in the etiology of bruxism. The aim was also to determine a connection between certain psychosomatic symptoms and bruxism. The analysis showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.02) in the results of the anxiety and stress test between the bruxism group and the control group. It was concluded that there is a higher level of psychoemotional tension, stress and anxiety in patients with bruxism. Higher frequency of psychosomatic symptoms (tachycardia, palpitation) was also present in the group with bruxism than in the control group (p<0.01). These results point out the importance of certain psychosomatic factors in the etiology of bruxism.

3. Muhvić-Urek M, Uhač I, Blečić N, Kovač Z, Šimunović-Šoškić M, Antonić R, Borčić J. The influence of bruxism on mandibular movement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2003;37(3):364-5.
    [details]
    [close]
   Full Text

   Title in English:	The influence of bruxism on mandibular movement
   Title in Croatian:	Utjecaj bruksizma na čeljusne kretnje
   Type of Article:	congress abstract
   MeSH:	BRUXISM
   Abstract:	The aetiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) remains controversial. The role of bruxism is still under discussion.The objective of this investigation was to determine the effect of bruxism on the function of the stomatognatic system.A group of 46 bruxers, aged from 24-52 years (x = 35.03 ± 6.92) was examined. The control group consisted of 50 nonbruxers aged from 25-51 years (x = 37.24 ± 6.37) bruxism was assessed by a questionaire and clinical examination. A precise calliper was used to measure jaw movement. Maximal opening, right and left aterotrusion, and maximal protrusion were measured. The mean value of maximal opening in the bruxers group was 48.51 ± 5.01 mm, and in the nonbruxers group 49.76 ± 6.92 mm. Ther mean value of maximal right laterotrusion in the bruxers group was 10.04 ± 2.51 mm, and of left laterotrusion 9.74 ± 2.50 mm compared to thenonbruxers group where the mean value of right laterotrusion was 10.31 ± 2.47 mm, and left laterotrusion 10.33 ± 2.30 mm. The mean value of maximal protrusion in the bruxers group was 9.53 ± 1.97 mm, while in the nonbruxers group it was 10.81 ± 2.29 mm. Pearson ?2 test analysis shows statisticaly significant difference (p < 0.05) between the groups only in relation to the maximal protrusion(t = 2.93, p = 0.0004).The results of this study suggest that bruxism may only have a limited influence on mandibular mobility.

4. Jagger RG, Cunningham I, Jagger DC. The Relationship between TMJ Dysfunction, Reported Bruxism and Recurrent Headaches. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1997;31(3):207-12.
    [details]
    [close]

   Title in English:	The Relationship between TMJ Dysfunction, Reported Bruxism and Recurrent Headaches
   Title in Croatian:	Odnos između temporomandibularne disfunkcije, bruksizma i povratnih glavobolja
   Type of Article:	original scientific paper
   MeSH:	TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT + pathology BRUXISM HEADACHE
   Abstract:	(not available)