List of Articles by MeSH
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS
- Hergüner Siso S, Er K, Hürmüzlü F, Kustarci A, Akpinar KE. Fracture Resistance of Root-Filled Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Current Dentin Bonding Adhesives. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2008;42(1):30-40.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Fracture Resistance of Root-Filled Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Current Dentin Bonding Adhesives |
| Title in Croatian: |
Otpornost na frakturu gornjih pretkutnjaka s kanalom punjenim dentinskim adhezivnim sustavima |
| Type of Article: |
original scientific paper |
| MeSH: |
BICUSPID
TOOTH FRACTURE
ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS
COMPOSITE RESINS |
| Abstract: |
Objective: The aim was to study and compare the fracture resistance of root-filled premolar teeth restored with various dentin bonding adhesives (DBAs). Material and Methods: Eighty extracted single-rooted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly assigned to eight groups (n=10). Group 1 (control) did not receive any preparation. From groups 2 to 8, the teeth were root filled and MOD cavities were prepared. Group 2 remained unrestored. Groups 3-8 were restored using the following DBAs: iBond (Heraeus Kulzer), G-Bond (GC Co.), Xeno III (Dentsply/Caulk), AdheSe (Ivoclar Vivadent), Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray) and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray); all preparations were further restored with a resin composite (Renew, Bisco). All specimens were then stored in 100% humidity at 37 ºC for 24 h, followed by thermal cycling 500 times between 5° and 55 °C. Compressive loading of the teeth was performed by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm min-1 until failure. The data were recorded in Newton (N) and were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test. Results: The mean loads necessary to fracture the samples in each group were: group 1: 984.00 ± 116.27a, group 2: 167.30 ± 47.26b, group 3: 872.30 ± 164.99a, group 4: 848.70 ± 157.84a, group 5: 916.30 ± 246.19a, group 6: 863.20 ± 197.69a, group 7: 802.20 ± 183.84a, group 8: 870.70 ± 126.48a. Similar letters indicate statistically similar values (P>0.05). Conclusion: The type of DBAs had no influence on the fracture resistance of teeth. |
- Prica D, Galić N, Želježić D, Prica A, Šegović S. Genotoxic Potential of Dentin Bonding Agents. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2007;41(2):104-14.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Genotoxic Potential of Dentin Bonding Agents |
| Title in Croatian: |
Genotoksični potencijal dentinskih adheziva |
| Type of Article: |
original scientific paper |
| MeSH: |
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS
MUTAGENS + toxicity
CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS |
| Abstract: |
The aim of this study was to examine the genotoxic activity of five dentin bonding agents: Adper Single Bond, Adper Single Bond 2, Prompt L-pop, Excite and Opti-Bond Solo Plus. This in vitro study was performed on human lymphocytes from peripheral blood, and the concentrations of dentin bonding agents tested were 0.2, 0.5 i 5 μg/ml, and elution times tested were 1 hour, 24 hours and 5 days. Genotoxicity testing was done using the Structural chromosomal aberration analysis cytogenic method , which determined the complete number of chromosome breaks, chromatide breaks and acentric fragments. The results showed genotoxicity of Opti-Bond Solo Plus in the 0.2 μg/ml concentration after a 24-hour elution period, then OptiBond Solo Plus in the 0.5 μg/ml concentration after a 1 hour elution period and OptiBond Solo Plus, Adper Single Bond 2 and Excite in the 0.5 μg/ml concentration after a 1 day elution period. In the 5 μg/ml concentration after 1 hour of elution, genotoxic potential was observed in cultures with OptiBond Solo Plus, Excite, Adper Single Bond 2 and Adper Single Bond, while all dentin bonding agents showed genotoxicity at that highest concentration but after 1 day of elution. From the results it is obvious that genotoxicity increases with the concentration of the dentin bonding agent, and decreases over time. The highest genotoxicity was observed after a 24-hour-elution period. |
- Kobašlija S, Selimović-Dragaš M, Huseinbegović A. The Effect of New Generation Self-etch Adhesives on the Quality of Composite Restorations. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2003;37(3):346-7.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
The Effect of New Generation Self-etch Adhesives on the Quality of Composite Restorations |
| Title in Croatian: |
Utjecaj nove generacije samojetkajućih adheziva na kakvoću kompozitnih ispuna |
| Type of Article: |
congress abstract |
| MeSH: |
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS
COMPOSITE RESINS |
| Abstract: |
Self-etch adhesives are introduced in clinical practice with the aim of eliminating nanoleakage, avoiding of wetbond technique and reducing the numerous bonding steps. There are two kinds of self-etch adhesives available on the market today: those that are applied in one and in two steps.The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two self-etch adhesives: Prompt L Pop (Self-etch Primer/Bonding agent-one step) and AdheSE (Self-etch Primer-Bonding agent-two steps) an the quality of Class III composite fillings.Composite filling material used in this study was Tetric Ceram Ivoclar Vivadent.The sample in this study comprises 60 Class III composite fillings, placed in children aged 12-16 years. Out of these, in 30 cases Prompt L Pop 3M ESPE was applied, and in the other 30 fillings, AdheSE Ivoclar Vivadent was used.For the evaluation of composite fillings USPHS criteria were used (A ideal; B-acceptable; C-unacceptable) for following paramaters: postoperative sensitivity, color match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, anatomic form and recurrent caries. The evaluations were performed after 3 and 6 months.Results showed no statistical difference in clinical appearance of fillings irrespective of which adhesive was used. |
- Šutalo J, Knežević A, Tarle Z. Influence of Dentine Adhesive with Nanofiller on Postrestorative Sensitivity. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2001;35(3):361-70.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Influence of Dentine Adhesive with Nanofiller on Postrestorative Sensitivity |
| Title in Croatian: |
Utjecaj dentinskog adheziva s nonopunilom na poslijerestorativnu osjetlivost zuba |
| Type of Article: |
original scientific paper |
| MeSH: |
ADHESIVES
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE |
| Abstract: |
Increasing requirements for the longevity of filling and marginal integration has influenced the development of new materials in restorative procedure on enamel and dentine. These requirements have contributed to the development of several generations of composite materials and dentine adhesives. Adhesion of the restorative material on the enamel is succesfully enhanced with the use of enamel adhesives, while bonding to dentine, because of its specific constitution and wetness of its surface, is not always acceptable and longlasting. The latest generation of dentine adhesives shows better bonding values, better sealing of the dentine surface and is simpler to handle than earlier generations of dentine adhesives. The aim of this study was to determine in 453 small medium and deep cavities the clinical existence of postrestorative sensitivity after the application of “Excite” one-bottle enamel-dentine adhesive under a composite resin filling one and three months after the application of the composite filling. After one month 21 teeth showed sensitivity of 1st, 2nd and 3th degree, and after three months only four teeth showed sensitivity of 1st and 2nd degree. This confirmed the fact that “Excite” enamel-dentine adhesive can successfully decrease the presence of postrestorative sensitivity. |
- Knežević A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Pandurić V, Šutalo J. The Most Frequently Used Materials for Compensation of Hard Tissue. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2000;34(4):379-90.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
The Most Frequently Used Materials for Compensation of Hard Tissue |
| Title in Croatian: |
Najčešće rabljeni materijali za naknadu tvrdog zubnog tkiva |
| Type of Article: |
original scientific paper |
| MeSH: |
COMPOSITE RESINS
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY |
| Abstract: |
The continual progress in development of new dental materials for tooth fillings and the presence of those materials on the market confuse the dentist when choosing the most appropriate material. The purpose of this research was to carry aut a survey in order to find out what are the most frequently used materials for permanent tooth fillings, dentine adhesives and polymerization units in clinical practice. The survey covered 304 subjects (doctors/dentists) with experience ranging from 1 to 40 years of practice. The results show that Tetric Ceram (Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) is the most used composite material, Syntac (Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) the most used dentine adhesive and Heliolux (Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) the most used curing unit for photopolymerisation of composite materials in clinical practice. |
- Knežević A, Tarle Z, Šutalo J, Pandurić V, Galić N, Ciglar I. Surface interactions of dentine and adhesives. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1998;32(3):459-73.
[details]
[close]
- Vojvodić D, Jerolimov V, Ćatović A, Lončar A, Husić Š, Indof J, Lazić B. Influence of the Kevloc bonding system on the metal-polymer interface. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1998;32(3):419-35.
[details]
[close]
- Azinović Z, Galić N, Lazić B, Keros J, Buković D, Jorgić-Srdjak K. Review of adhesion to enamel and dentin. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1998;32(2):323-36.
[details]
[close]
- Ferk S, Anić I. [Marginal dye microleakage in the class V composite fillings pre-treated by different dentin bonding agents]. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1997;31(3):221-7.
[details]
[close]
- Vojvodić D, Jerolimov V, Čelebić A, Indof J, Ćatović A, Husić Š. [Investigation of the bonding strength of the AD bonding system]. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1996;30(4):267-74.
[details]
[close]
- Šutalo Z, Meniga A. [Polymerization contraction of composite resin filling]. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1994;28(1):41-6.
[details]
[close]
- Šutalo J, Ledić B, Huljev S, Anić I. [Classification of dentin bonding agents]. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1992;26(2):139-46.
[details]
[close]
|