List of Articles by MeSH
ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION
- Rebić J, Macan D, Grgurević L. Immediate Implant Placement in a Previously Infected Alveola: Case
Report. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2008;42(1):101.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Immediate Implant Placement in a Previously Infected Alveola: Case
Report |
| Title in Croatian: |
Imedijatna implantacija u primarno inficiranu alveolu: prikaz slučaja |
| Type of Article: |
congress abstract |
| MeSH: |
DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH DENTAL PORCELAIN ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION BONE SUBSTITUTES |
| Abstract: |
We present a case report of immediate implant placement with augmentation of xenogenous bone material in a 36-year-old patient after upper first molar extraction with progressive periodontitis. Lindeboom et al. found 8% of complications in immediate implant placement in locations with periapical infection, while Schwartz et al. found 56.7% complications after implant placement in patients with infective posttraumatic processes. Both authors agree that immediate implant placement can be used with predictable results and that the inflammatory process on an implant site does not have to influence the outcome of implant placement and prosthetic restoration. After clinical and radiographic examination the extraction of tooth 16 was indicated. The decision on immediate implant placement was achieved due to the possible intra- and postoperative complications regarding late implantation and prolonged time of prosthetic treatment after sinus lift procedure. Alveola was curetted after extraction; during wall integrity examination we determined the position of the future implant, but there was no acceptable length. Osteotomes were used to deepen the osteotomy, and screw tap was used to form the site for the implant. Prepared site was augmented with 500 mg of xenogenous bone material (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich Biomaterials, Switzerland). Ankylos B11 implant was placed in the osteotomy and covered with a resorbable membrane (Bio-Gide® Geistlich Biomaterials, Switzerland). Mucoperiosteal flap was mobilized by cutting the periosteum, and sutured back in place. Six months after implant placement a healing abutment was placed. Two weeks later an impression was taken and shade of the future crown was determined. Ankylos Balance Posterior abutment was screwed onto the implant and the finished crown was cemented. |
- Krenkel C. Bony Reconstruction and Implantology for Full Rehabilitation of the
Masticatory Apparatus. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2008;42(1):94.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Bony Reconstruction and Implantology for Full Rehabilitation of the
Masticatory Apparatus |
| Title in Croatian: |
Koštana rekonstrukcija i implantologija u potpunoj rehabilitaciji žvačnog
sustava |
| Type of Article: |
congress abstract |
| MeSH: |
DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS BONE SUBSTITUTES ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION |
| Abstract: |
The introduction of implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of our patients in everyday dental practice has notably improved the quality of living. Such procedures can successfully resolve many functional and esthetic problems; however, some difficult cases, which require long-term and extensive intervention, still remain. First and foremost being severe jaw atrophy, where the alveolar process is no longer present. Such conditions are more frequent in the lower jaw where the stability and retention of lower complete dentures represent a leading problem in dentistry. The main cause of severe atrophies is early tooth loss, which was not prosthetically substituted. In such patients it is necessary to increase the mass of and build up the jawbone (augmentation). In those cases artificial bone is used (inorganic parts of animal bones or synthetic materials) or even bone autotransplantation. Autologus bone has shown to be successful, but it requires the opening of yet another operative field in the lower jaw (chin, retromolar area), crista iliaca or parietal bone (calvaria graft). Sometimes, depending on indications, simultaneous implant setting is performed. In more difficult cases, it is necessary to first increase the bone mass, wait 4 to 6 weeks for the integration of the autologus bone and only then perform the implantation. After the implant is fixated with small screws, we must carefully fixate the periosteal layer with resorbing sutures to ensure the operative field is covered with a double layer. The patients should not wear dentures during this time.In the lateral segment of the upper jaw, sinus lifting is performed in cases with severe atrophies and alveolar resorption of the maxillary sinus. At times simultaneously with implantation, where as in more difficult cases only sinus lifting is performed and implantation follows 4 to 6 months after.Nowadays, severe atrophies of the lower jaw (classes 5 and 6 according to Watzek) are solved with bone endo-distraction. For that purpose, special instruments were constructed and hollow implants (distractors) which after osteotomy of the lower jaw, are embedded in the osteotomised section of the lower jaw. We use one or two distractors. Gradually turning the distraction screw which passes through the hollow implant, we way we stimulate callus formation or bone growth between the described sections. With the described procedure, we can noticeably increase and heighten the front of the lower jaw. We often insert 4 implants after 3 to 4 months and make a prosthetic suprastructure with an extended bar onto which the cover denture is attached. Thus, good functional and esthetic results are achieved. In the described procedure, so far there has not been any secondary implant loss or development of periimplantitis. |
- Gabrić D, Katanec D. Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2007;41(1):57-65.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation |
| Title in Croatian: |
Elevacija dna maksilarnog sinusa |
| Type of Article: |
review |
| MeSH: |
ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION MAXILLARY SINUS ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES |
| Abstract: |
Distal edentulousness of the maxilla, together with extensive resorption of the alveolar crest or high pneumatization of the maxillary sinus, is often a limiting factor for implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. It is possible to compensate insufficient bone volume by elevating the floor of the maxillary sinus using an operative procedure (sinus floor elevation or sinus lifting). Elevation of the sinus floor is an operative procedure based on moving the bottom of the sinus cranially while simultaneously augmenting the bone defect, with the purpose of creating sufficient height at the bone fundament needed for the placement of dental implants. This operative technique has been routine in clinical practice since 1986 and is constantly being improved and modified. The purpose of this review is to present the different techniques in sinus lifting with all their advantages and disadvantages in order to render their implementation in clinical practice as successful as possible. Elevating the maxillary sinus floor by augmentation with allograft or autologous bone implants is a reliable method which broadens the indications for the placement of dental implants in the molar region of alveolar bone A, where, due to extensive pneumatization of the maxillary sinus, it was not previously possible. |
- Krekeler G. Clinical Experience with Vertical Bone Augmentation. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2005;39(3):246.
[details]
[close]
Full Text
| Title in English: |
Clinical Experience with Vertical Bone Augmentation |
| Title in Croatian: |
Klinička iskustva s okomitim povećanjem kosti |
| Type of Article: |
congress abstract |
| MeSH: |
ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION |
| Abstract: |
A permanent anchorage of dental implants needs sufficent bone for the expected osseointegration. If there is not enough bone we have to try to augment the structure. This is not difficult in the horizontal direction but often unreliable in the height. Different methods are described, and only a few with good prognosis. Clinical experience has shown that block-augmentation with autologeous bone- at least for the upper jaw- or vertical bone-distraction with internal or external distractors in superior to all other methods. |
- Rainer H. Bone augmentation in the alveolar process with sis titanium foils. Acta Stomatol Croat. 1998;32(Suppl):154.
[details]
[close]
| Title in English: |
Bone augmentation in the alveolar process with sis titanium foils |
| Title in Croatian: |
nema |
| Type of Article: |
congress abstract |
| MeSH: |
ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION |
| Abstract: |
(not available) |
|